Washington, D.C. (June 27, 2018) – The American Wild Horse Campaign (AWHC), The Cloud Foundation, and Western Watersheds Project (WWP) filed suit today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) challenging the agency’s decision to roundup and permanently remove all wild horses from the Caliente Herd Area (HA) Complex, without considering reductions to domestic livestock in the same area. The wild horse and environmental conservation advocates are represented by the public interest environmental law firm Meyer Glitzenstein & Eubanks LLP.
While implementing a 2008 decision to eradicate wild horses from over 700,000 acres of the Complex in southeastern Nevada, the BLM will continue to authorize large-scale, taxpayer-subsidized livestock grazing on these public lands.
“We are directly challenging the BLM’s decision to eradicate all federally-protected wild horses from the public lands within the Caliente Complex while continuing to authorize thousands of privately-owned cattle to graze the same area,” said attorney Bill Eubanks. “The BLM’s decisions to ‘zero out’ this Congressionally-designated wild horse habitat clearly violates the agency’s obligations to protect wild horses under federal law. Therefore, we are asking the court to vacate these illegal decisions in order to protect the wild horses of the Caliente Complex.”
The BLM authorizes more than 4,500 cows and sheep to graze in the Complex as a whole and is proposing to roundup via traumatic helicopter stampede the 1,744 wild horses that the Complex currently supports.
"Over the last four decades, BLM has taken away nearly 40 percent of the habitat designated by Congress for wild horse use. We are taking a stand today to stop the agency from eliminating wild horses and turning our public lands over to use by private livestock, who graze thanks to our tax subsidies,” said Suzanne Roy, Executive Director of AWHC. “It's time for the BLM to stop prioritizing ranching special interests and start honoring the wishes of Americans to ensure that our iconic mustangs are protected and humanely managed on our public lands."
“The Cloud Foundation is proud to stand alongside these organizations in challenging the BLM’s unconscionable decision to remove these wild horses from their home and their families in order to make more room for livestock to graze,” said Ginger Kathrens, Executive Director of The Cloud Foundation. “Time and again we see wild horses, a federally protected species, scapegoated for rangeland damage while thousands of cattle wreak havoc on our public lands.”
“We have a real and widespread problem with overgrazing on western public lands, and in almost every case the cause is domestic livestock, not wild horses, or mule deer, or elk,” said Erik Molvar, a wildlife biologist and Executive Director with Western Watersheds Project. “Over the past several administrations, the Bureau of Land Management has systematically and unfairly blamed land health problems on wild horses so they can distract the public from the real culprit, which is the livestock industry.”
The Caliente HA Complex is roughly 911,892 acres in southeastern Nevada. The fate of the horses within the Complex is influenced by the 2008 Ely District Range Management Plan (Ely RMP). The Ely RMP finalized the BLM’s decision to permanently remove all wild horses from sixteen longstanding Herd Management Areas (HMAs), including eight of the nine HMAs in the Caliente Complex—meaning that BLM set the Appropriate Management Levels (AMLs) for these areas to zero. At the same time, the agency refused to even consider any reductions to domestic livestock grazing on these same public lands. In the 2018 Final Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Caliente Complex, the BLM chose to implement the decision made in the Ely RMP.
However, under federal law, wild horse populations must be managed to maintain “a thriving natural ecological balance.” Therefore, this lawsuit primarily charges the BLM with violating the Wild Horse Act (WHA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by failing to protect wild horses and eliminating one of the chief uses of these public lands. The BLM has also violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by failing to give full consideration to the alternatives to, and the impacts of, this proposed action. This failure means that the public was deprived of an opportunity to meaningfully assess and respond to the rationale underlying the BLM’s decision.
The BLM must consider reasonable alternatives short of the elimination of wild horses in these sixteen longstanding wild horse management areas. One of the major contentions of this lawsuit is demanding that the BLM analyze and consider a reduction in livestock grazing in order to satisfy its mandate under the WHA to protect wild horses. The livestock industry does a tremendous amount of damage to land health because there are no legal requirements for the BLM to manage domestic livestock grazing on public lands in a similar manner to how wild horses are managed.